Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Is It Normal If A Wart Is On Your Nuckle

A new culture for the Left? We must build it together!

Una nuova cultura per la Sinistra ?
Dobbiamo costruirla insieme !

di Manfredi Mangano

Salve a tutti ! Sono tornato, dopo la pausa pasquale e post-elettorale, e come promesso non ho intenzione di lasciar morire questo blog, tutt'altro.
Proprio pochi giorni fa, Elisabetta (la mia ragazza N.d.A) ha comprato un libro sulla storia del Partito Socialista Italiano, e iniziata la lettura si è trovata a leggere di come siamo nati, nella Sala Sivori a Genova 118 anni fa, dando inizio a quella che fu una vera e propria storia di "apostolato laico".

The question arises, and in fact my boyfriend has made me almost instantly, but that remains today, the spirit, not only in the Party in which soldiers, but throughout the Italian Left? A challenge, perhaps, but awfully current, because actually the first issue that was discussed after these regional elections go well in our Brands of some, but not much else, was that of a possible "new face" for the center (the third in three years? Have mercy!), together with the breadth of the coalition (Communist communist or not? UDC UDC yes or no? and so on).


Discorsi meramente politicisti, con il loro indubbio fondamento per carità, ma che non rispondono alla prima esigenza della nostra Sinistra: falliti i partiti di massa novecenteschi, dal PCI al PSI alla DC, fallito il modello veltroniano del partito liquido, cambiato drasticamente il mondo ... ch'addafà la Sinistra per tornare al governare ?


La prima risposta che penso dovremo porci è : CHI VOGLIAMO RAPPRESENTARE ?


Di per me, io continuo a considerare valida la distinzione di Bobbio Norberto, una delle autorità italiane della scienza politica, su cosa sia la destra e cosa la sinistra. La Sinistra dovrebbe essere la forza che più tende a difendere l'eguagilanza, sociale, economica e culturale. La destra quella che invece propone soluzioni più verticali, che siano messe in termini di "darwinismo sociale" liberista (solo i più forti sopravvivono) o in senso gerarchico, tradizionalista / religioso, o addirittura autoritario.


Di conseguenza, non credo che debba mutare il bacino di persone che vogliamo rappresentare: si tratta di tutti i ceti svantaggiati dall'attuale società, che dobbiamo almeno provare a promuovere in un'ottica di maggiore equità.


Ma quali sono oggi i ceti svantaggiati, e come è possibile coinvolgerli, dopo che il trionfo dell'individuo-consumatore
has crumbled the old membership class, and after that the economic globalization has enabled the "capital" to economic resources, to move wherever they want, without worrying too much about the opinion of those who work? Personally, I think that our political system has gone structuring, with the rise of Berlusconi, on two opposing visions of the country: -groups in business, in 1994, came from a long period of subjection to political parties political center or even left of center, as the PSI, which will impose a secure system through public expenditure which supported consumption and production, demanding bribes in exchange for aid and patronage. The collapse of the whole shebang brought out the overwhelming desire to "do for self" and to shake off these deposits: the first manifestation of this process was obviously secessionism League, followed by the "New Italian Miracle" by Berlusconi. - A part of the working classes, those who came from the PCI and then met with a piece of DC, however, was by a long history of exclusion from national power (but not local), lived with a real and its mythology of being "different" from the rest of the country, if not seen as a backward medieval. however, arrived al potere, il blocco sociale che sosteneva Berlusconi come "Thatcher all'amatriciana", uomo delle tasse basse, del libero licenziamento, della concorrenza e così via, si è reso conto che ... non gli conveniva una politica così ! Abituati da anni a vivere di incentivi, rottamazioni auto, cassa integrazioni e aiuti vari, doversi confrontare con economie come quella tedesca sul grande mercato mondiale senza l'aiuto offerto da strumenti come una moneta facilmente "sputtanabile" onde rendere più economiche le nostre merci, non era certo la prospettiva più rosea per molti imprenditori: non è un caso che le nostre imprese abbiano il tasso di ricerca e innovazione più basso del mondo occidentale, non sviluppino sinergie with universities, and competitive strategies as dot on wages as low as possible, rather than on quality! From here begins the long march of the Italian right, the liberal conception of a conservative, protectionist, even a little xenophobic, that has enabled it in the years to obtain the consent of a majority also increasingly confused world of work. And why did it come to this? Why the Left came to power, the opposite happened: the huge problems facing the country, perhaps prisoners of the old idea of \u200b\u200bMarx that only developed countries can make the revolution, the leaders of the left have decided that our before "to do such as Sweden, needed to become a little more modern. And to do that by simplifying a lot, have staked everything on three things: Europe as a salvific horizon, respectability at entrepreneurs and banks as a strategy, the "civil rights" as a replacement of the old revolutionary program. think of Europe as the only salvation was our chance to start a positive process, gave us the Euro, at least some accounts in order and the first national effort shared a long time. But now, say that Europe is ahead and behind us is not only a convenient way out to explain our failures, but it is also wrong: Europe, and Sarkozy Sarko-show, there looks more and more, for the worse! Respectability with banks and entrepreneurs, also encouraged by the mentality of the '90s, the Olive Tree World, Clinton and company, led the center to privatize the entire privatization in an attempt to forget the breathtaking country and the world from many of his men from the PCI to be more credible and expendable in the mass media. The result, combined with the metamorphosis of the right referred to above, it was revealed in all its devastating last day combined weight factor. failed to renew the hopes of radically la distribuzione della ricchezza, sopratutto da parte dell'estrema sinistra si è sostituito il vecchio vangelo rivoluzionario con una enfasi ossessiva sulla polemica con la Chiesa e sui diritti civili, dai glbt ai migranti, sacrosanta e necessaria per una civiltà avanzata, ma che è diventata l'unico discrimine della politica. Il disastro è stato, però, che la necessità di contrastare il berlusconismo e l'alleanza coi poteri forti avevano intanto costretto la sinistra a venire a patti con esponenti politici conservatori, fino a farci un nuovo partito, il Partito Democratico: e chiaramente, quando l'unica cosa di cui riesci a parlare, per poterti distinguere, sono i matrimoni omosessuali, è chiaro che se ti tieni Christian Democrats in the house will end up fighting. said than done, for two years to the left of the Democratic Party and its "right" continue to fight on civil rights, to the point of not being able to define what it is, which expresses the political culture, the Democratic Party, in a debate that not passionate about anybody, and that the working classes must be brought to look to the right, a right that in a moment of crisis, has made an offer very simple. "You have little competition might make the immigrant, if you help us to chase away what little we have we guarantee it." A logical false, and dangerous to workers who hides the true protagonists of exploitation, but it worked. Today, we have a big problem, but also a historic opportunity. The big problem is that the center is broken, do not know which way to turn and in his frantic attempt to hold together drives radical-chic and respectability "with the center" is a kind of schizoid without drugs. The historic opportunity is summed up by the victory of Comrade Vendola in Puglia in an agricultural region, the deep South, with strong local economic interests and an equally strong popular religion, a few kilometers from the Albanian coast, won the election an openly gay, a practicing Catholic but supports every imaginable extension of civil rights. E perchè ce l'ha fatta ? Io un'idea ce l'ho, ha vinto grazie al modo e alle persone con cui ha parlato. Vendola in televisione fa pena. E' troppo "meridionale" per arrivare al punto e bucare il video, gesticola, poeteggia e così via. Ma sul territorio batte ogni villaggio sperduto, fa comizi fantastici, fa sognare la gente, e sopratutto la organizza. La organizza sui problemi quotidiani, con le sue Fabbriche, facendola partecipare direttamente: riesce a inserirla in una Storia che parte dai nostri casini di tutti i giorni, e da lì può tranquillamente arrivare a parlare di coppie di fatto o diritti degli immigrati. Perchè è costruita in un modo tale da non escludere una tematica a favore di altre, but rather to make us understand that the work is the first Civil Rights, and that regular unmarried couples is not a fixed radical-chic, but a basic fact of social justice that allows the reconstruction of family ties, social, friendship , cooperation and solidarity, which are routinely destroyed by insecurity. Vendola also has a problem, though: so far, is the head of a small party, the sum of four divisions of veterans from other smaller parties. His charisma is not enough to change the Italian left, and certainly his support apparatus may not help much. We need to build a project, what is left, what should be, and what should be done in this country, based on its needs. That 's what, in small and with your help, I would try to achieve here at Fabriano. Let's start with this blog, meet in the square, we could also create an association, but the important thing is to ask "Who are we, Where are we going, what they want, or if you want." are not easy questions, but I'm sure we can respond together! Of course, we begin to discuss it here and here:
manfredimangano.splinder.com

0 comments:

Post a Comment